2006 Cadillac SRX vs. 1980 Volvo 164
To start off, 2006 Cadillac SRX is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac SRX (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 164.
Because 2006 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Volvo 164. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac SRX (427 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 164. (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac SRX | 1980 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | SRX | 164 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3350 mm |