2006 Cadillac SRX vs. 1998 Panoz Q9
To start off, 2006 Cadillac SRX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Panoz Q9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Panoz Q9 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Panoz Q9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Panoz Q9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Panoz Q9 (678 Nm) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac SRX. (344 Nm). This means 1998 Panoz Q9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac SRX.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac SRX | 1998 Panoz Q9 | |
Make | Cadillac | Panoz |
Model | SRX | Q9 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3563 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 344 Nm | 678 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 59 L |