2006 Cadillac SRX vs. 1999 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2006 Cadillac SRX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 702 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 2006 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac SRX (344 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Impala. (305 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Impala.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac SRX | 1999 Chevrolet Impala | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | SRX | Impala |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3563 cc | 3786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 344 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1889 kg | 1187 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 56 L |
