2006 Cadillac SRX vs. 2001 Ford F-650
To start off, 2006 Cadillac SRX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford F-650. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford F-650 would be higher. At 7,300 cc, 2001 Ford F-650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac SRX (255 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2001 Ford F-650. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford F-650. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 591 kg more than 2001 Ford F-650. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford F-650. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford F-650 (1,166 Nm) has 822 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac SRX. (344 Nm). This means 2001 Ford F-650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac SRX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac SRX | 2001 Ford F-650 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | SRX | F-650 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3556 cc | 7300 cc |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 344 Nm | 1166 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1889 kg | 1298 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 4930 mm |
