2006 Cadillac SRX vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2006 Cadillac SRX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 3,562 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac SRX (256 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 544 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac SRX (342 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac SRX | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | SRX | CU-X |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3562 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 342 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1889 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 80 L |
