2006 Cadillac SRX vs. 2002 Spyker C8
To start off, 2006 Cadillac SRX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 671 kg more than 2002 Spyker C8.
Because 2006 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Spyker C8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac SRX | 2002 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Spyker |
| Model | SRX | C8 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3562 cc | 4172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1889 kg | 1218 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 100 L |
