2006 Cadillac SRX vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Cadillac SRX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac SRX (320 HP) has 253 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2006 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac SRX | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | SRX | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 67 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2490 mm |