2006 Cadillac SRX vs. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100
To start off, 2006 Cadillac SRX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rolls-Royce 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 would be higher. At 8,998 cc (16 cylinders), 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 weights approximately 751 kg more than 2006 Cadillac SRX.
Because 2006 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Rolls-Royce 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac SRX | 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rolls-Royce |
Model | SRX | 100 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3562 cc | 8998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 84.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1889 kg | 2640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 80 L |