2006 Cadillac STS-V vs. 1963 MG 1100
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG 1100 would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 387 more horse power than 1963 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1963 MG 1100.
Because 2006 Cadillac STS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (584 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 501 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS-V | 1963 MG 1100 | |
Make | Cadillac | MG |
Model | STS-V | 1100 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 440 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 584 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2380 mm |