2006 Cadillac STS-V vs. 1965 Trabant P 601
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Trabant P 601. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Trabant P 601 would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 417 more horse power than 1965 Trabant P 601. (23 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1965 Trabant P 601.
Because 2006 Cadillac STS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Trabant P 601, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (584 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 531 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Trabant P 601. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Trabant P 601.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS-V | 1965 Trabant P 601 | |
Make | Cadillac | Trabant |
Model | STS-V | P 601 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 440 HP | 23 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 584 Nm | 53 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 24 L |