2006 Cadillac STS-V vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS-V | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
Model | STS-V | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 5736 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 440 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2960 mm |