2006 Cadillac STS-V vs. 1972 Morris 1800
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Morris 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Morris 1800 would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 332 more horse power than 1972 Morris 1800. (108 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1972 Morris 1800.
Because 2006 Cadillac STS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Morris 1800, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (584 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 412 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Morris 1800. (172 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Morris 1800.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac STS-V | 1972 Morris 1800 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Morris |
| Model | STS-V | 1800 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4376 cc | 2227 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 440 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 584 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2700 mm |
