2006 Cadillac STS-V vs. 1982 Ford Escort
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Escort. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Escort would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 370 more horse power than 1982 Ford Escort. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Escort.
Because 2006 Cadillac STS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Ford Escort, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (584 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 463 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Escort. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Escort.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS-V | 1982 Ford Escort | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | STS-V | Escort |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 440 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 584 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2400 mm |