2006 Cadillac STS-V vs. 1986 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 339 more horse power than 1986 Ford Taurus. (101 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Taurus.
Because 2006 Cadillac STS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (584 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 397 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Taurus. (187 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS-V | 1986 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | STS-V | Taurus |
Year Released | 2006 | 1986 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 2513 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 440 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 584 Nm | 187 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2700 mm |