2006 Cadillac STS-V vs. 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer

To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 383 more horse power than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer.

Because 2006 Cadillac STS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (584 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 476 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer. (108 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac STS-V 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer
Make Cadillac Mitsubishi
Model STS-V Lancer
Year Released 2006 1986
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4376 cc 1795 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 440 HP 57 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 584 Nm 108 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 2500 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4190 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2390 mm