2006 Cadillac STS-V vs. 1994 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1994 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur. (301 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1994 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur (600 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac STS-V. (584 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1994 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac STS-V.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS-V | 1994 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur | |
Make | Cadillac | Rolls-Royce |
Model | STS-V | Silver Spur |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 440 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 584 Nm | 600 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 108 L |