2006 Cadillac STS-V vs. 1997 Ford F-250
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 6,800 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1997 Ford F-250. (306 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford F-250.
Because 1997 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac STS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (584 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford F-250. (575 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford F-250.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS-V | 1997 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | STS-V | F-250 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 6800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 440 HP | 306 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 584 Nm | 575 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3490 mm |