2006 Cadillac STS-V vs. 1998 Ford Laser
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Laser would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 327 more horse power than 1998 Ford Laser. (113 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Laser.
Because 2006 Cadillac STS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (584 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 416 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Laser. (168 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Laser.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS-V | 1998 Ford Laser | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | STS-V | Laser |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 440 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 584 Nm | 168 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 53 L |