2006 Cadillac STS-V vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 327 more horse power than 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner. (113 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac STS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (584 Nm) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner. (270 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS-V | 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | STS-V | Space Liner |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 440 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 584 Nm | 270 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 90 L |