2006 Cadillac STS-V vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac STS-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac STS-V would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP) has 230 more horse power than 2010 Holden Colorado. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (584 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Colorado. (313 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Colorado. 2006 Cadillac STS-V has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Colorado has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Colorado will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Cadillac STS-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac STS-V | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | STS-V | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4376 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 440 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 584 Nm | 313 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
