2006 Cadillac STS-V vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac STS-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac STS-V would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 317 more horse power than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (123 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda BT-50.

Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac STS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (584 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda BT-50. 2006 Cadillac STS-V has automatic transmission and 2011 Mazda BT-50 has manual transmission. 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Cadillac STS-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac STS-V 2011 Mazda BT-50
Make Cadillac Mazda
Model STS-V BT-50
Year Released 2006 2011
Body Type Sedan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4376 cc 2604 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 440 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 584 Nm 206 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3500 RPM
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 3010 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.1 L/100km 8.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 64 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]