2006 Cadillac STS-V vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK

To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac STS-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac STS-V would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK. (182 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (584 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK. (250 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac STS-V 2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK
Make Cadillac Mercedes-Benz
Model STS-V SLK
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type Sedan Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4376 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 440 HP 182 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 584 Nm 250 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 1800 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 7-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4135 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1816 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2431 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 60 L