2006 Cadillac STS vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (253 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. (164 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 78 kg more than 2006 Cadillac STS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac STS | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | STS | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1950 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3563 cc | 5673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 164 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.6 mm | 114.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 6.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1782 kg | 1860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3690 mm |
