2006 Cadillac STS vs. 1960 Humber Hawk

To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (321 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 1960 Humber Hawk. (73 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1960 Humber Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac STS weights approximately 418 kg more than 1960 Humber Hawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS (427 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Humber Hawk. (163 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Humber Hawk. 2006 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1960 Humber Hawk has manual transmission. 1960 Humber Hawk will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac STS 1960 Humber Hawk
Make Cadillac Humber
Model STS Hawk
Year Released 2006 1960
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4565 cc 2266 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 321 HP 73 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 427 Nm 163 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 2300 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93 mm 81 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 110 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 7.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1818 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2800 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 56 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]