2006 Cadillac STS vs. 1961 Dodge Polara
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,907 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (321 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1961 Dodge Polara. (301 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1961 Dodge Polara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac STS weights approximately 293 kg more than 1961 Dodge Polara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac STS | 1961 Dodge Polara | |
| Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
| Model | STS | Polara |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 5907 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1818 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2960 mm |
