2006 Cadillac STS vs. 1961 Volvo 220
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (253 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1961 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1961 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac STS weights approximately 767 kg more than 1961 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS | 1961 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | STS | 220 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3563 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 342 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1782 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2610 mm |