2006 Cadillac STS vs. 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (321 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. (104 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac STS weights approximately 803 kg more than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac STS | 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | STS | Dove GTR4 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 2138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1818 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 29 L |
