2006 Cadillac STS vs. 1977 Opel Commodore
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Opel Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Opel Commodore would be higher. At 4,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1977 Opel Commodore. (141 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1977 Opel Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS (428 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Opel Commodore. (217 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Opel Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS | 1977 Opel Commodore | |
Make | Cadillac | Opel |
Model | STS | Commodore |
Year Released | 2006 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4556 cc | 2784 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 428 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 69.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |