2006 Cadillac STS vs. 1978 Zastava 2101

To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (253 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac STS weights approximately 822 kg more than 1978 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 2101. 2006 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1978 Zastava 2101 has manual transmission. 1978 Zastava 2101 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: