2006 Cadillac STS vs. 1980 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac STS weights approximately 632 kg more than 1980 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2006 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS | 1980 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Cadillac | Plymouth |
Model | STS | Reliant |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3563 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1782 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2260 mm |