2006 Cadillac STS vs. 1981 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac STS weights approximately 242 kg more than 1981 Chrysler Le Baron.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS | 1981 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | STS | Le Baron |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3563 cc | 3678 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1782 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2870 mm |