2006 Cadillac STS vs. 1983 Chrysler Laser
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 4,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Because 2006 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS (428 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS | 1983 Chrysler Laser | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | STS | Laser |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4556 cc | 2211 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 428 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2470 mm |