2006 Cadillac STS vs. 1986 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 4,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS (428 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS | 1986 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | STS | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1986 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4556 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 428 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 71.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 57 L |