2006 Cadillac STS vs. 1989 TVR Type S
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 TVR Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 TVR Type S would be higher. At 4,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1989 TVR Type S has manual transmission. 1989 TVR Type S will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac STS | 1989 TVR Type S | |
| Make | Cadillac | TVR |
| Model | STS | Type S |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4556 cc | 2933 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1130 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2300 mm |
