2006 Cadillac STS vs. 1993 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 4,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1993 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1993 Mercury Villager.
Because 2006 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS | 1993 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | STS | Villager |
Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4556 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2860 mm |