2006 Cadillac STS vs. 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (321 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC. (141 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC weights approximately 232 kg more than 2006 Cadillac STS.
Because 2006 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS | 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | STS | MCC |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 2962 cc |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1818 kg | 2050 kg |