2006 Cadillac STS vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (253 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac STS weights approximately 597 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac STS | 1995 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | STS | 200 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3563 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 342 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 84.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.6 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1782 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
