2006 Cadillac STS vs. 1996 Chevrolet Lumina

To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Lumina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Lumina would be higher. At 4,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (320 HP) has 120 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Lumina. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Lumina.

Because 2006 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS (428 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Lumina. (311 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Lumina.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac STS 1996 Chevrolet Lumina
Make Cadillac Chevrolet
Model STS Lumina
Year Released 2006 1996
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4556 cc 3789 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 320 HP 200 HP
Torque 428 Nm 311 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93 mm 96.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 86.4 mm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 5110 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2740 mm