2006 Cadillac STS vs. 1997 Acura SLX
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura SLX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura SLX would be higher. At 4,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (320 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1997 Acura SLX. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura SLX.
Because 2006 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura SLX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS | 1997 Acura SLX | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | STS | SLX |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4556 cc | 3494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 190 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4661 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1834 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2761 mm |