2006 Cadillac STS vs. 1999 Toyota XYR
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Toyota XYR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Toyota XYR would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (321 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1999 Toyota XYR. (180 HP @ 7600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1999 Toyota XYR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac STS weights approximately 678 kg more than 1999 Toyota XYR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Toyota XYR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS (427 Nm) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Toyota XYR. (175 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Toyota XYR.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS | 1999 Toyota XYR | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | STS | XYR |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 7600 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1818 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2680 mm |