2006 Cadillac STS vs. 2001 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac STS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS (342 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Subaru Outback. (282 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS | 2001 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
Model | STS | Outback |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3563 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 342 Nm | 282 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 89.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2530 mm |