2006 Cadillac STS vs. 2002 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (253 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 543 kg more than 2006 Cadillac STS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS | 2002 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | STS | Econoline |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3563 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 342 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1782 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3510 mm |