2006 Cadillac STS vs. 2002 Honda Acty

To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Honda Acty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Honda Acty would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (253 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2002 Honda Acty. (127 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Acty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac STS weights approximately 942 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS (342 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Acty. (139 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Acty. 2006 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 2002 Honda Acty has manual transmission. 2002 Honda Acty will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: