2006 Cadillac STS vs. 2004 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econoline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS (428 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS | 2004 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | STS | Econoline |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4556 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 428 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3510 mm |