2006 Cadillac STS vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Saab 9000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Saab 9000 would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (253 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2005 Saab 9000. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 9000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac STS weights approximately 192 kg more than 2005 Saab 9000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saab 9000 (350 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac STS. (342 Nm). This means 2005 Saab 9000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac STS.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Saab |
Model | STS | 9000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3563 cc | 2290 cc |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 342 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1782 kg | 1590 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2710 mm |