2006 Cadillac STS vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee

To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac STS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac STS would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 167 kg more than 2006 Cadillac STS.

Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac STS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac STS. (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac STS.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac STS 2008 Jeep Cherokee
Make Cadillac Jeep
Model STS Cherokee
Year Released 2006 2008
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3563 cc 2776 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 253 HP 0 HP
Torque 342 Nm 400 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 17.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Diesel
Top Speed 229 km/hour 169 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 7.4 seconds 12.6 seconds
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1782 kg 1949 kg
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 12.4 L/100km 9.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 78 L