2006 Cadillac STS vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac STS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac STS would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac STS weights approximately 612 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac STS | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | STS | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1782 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3678 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1585 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 2.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 1.9 L/100km |