2006 Cadillac STS vs. 2013 Honda Fit
To start off, 2013 Honda Fit is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac STS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac STS would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (253 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 2013 Honda Fit. (115 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2013 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac STS weights approximately 666 kg more than 2013 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda Fit. (144 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda Fit. 2006 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 2013 Honda Fit has manual transmission. 2013 Honda Fit will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac STS | 2013 Honda Fit | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | STS | Fit |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3563 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 342 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.6 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.4 : 1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1782 kg | 1116 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4105 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1525 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 40 L |
