2006 Cadillac STS vs. 2013 Scion iQ

To start off, 2013 Scion iQ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac STS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac STS would be higher. At 4,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 2013 Scion iQ. (93 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2013 Scion iQ.

Because 2013 Scion iQ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac STS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Scion iQ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS (428 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Scion iQ. (121 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Scion iQ.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac STS 2013 Scion iQ
Make Cadillac Scion
Model STS iQ
Year Released 2006 2013
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4556 cc 1329 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V single
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 320 HP 93 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 428 Nm 121 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93 mm 72 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 80 mm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Single Speed
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 3045 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2000 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.1 L/100km 4.6 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.8 L/100km 5.5 L/100km