2006 Cadillac XLR vs. 1951 Toyota SA
To start off, 2006 Cadillac XLR is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Toyota SA would be higher. At 4,563 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac XLR (322 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 1951 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1951 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 484 kg more than 1951 Toyota SA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac XLR | 1951 Toyota SA | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | XLR | SA |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4563 cc | 995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2410 mm |
